Hurricane Ike - Part IV 952mb - 100mph Cat 2 - WNW @ 10mph - 25.8N 88.8W - 2pm EDT
#1344
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:26 PM
172130 2547N 08843W 6969 02740 9515 +161 +110 173003 010 999 999 03
172200 2549N 08842W 6972 02730 9494 +181 +110 113019 023 999 999 03
172230 2550N 08842W 6965 02741 9491 +187 +110 118027 029 999 999 03
172300 2551N 08840W 6973 02733 9492 +187 +110 133036 040 999 999 03
#1346
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:28 PM
HurricaneJosh, on Sep 11 2008, 12:23 PM, said:
Its dry air, pretty evident on the loop. Oh well. One thing that could help the overall structure in the center and clear out that old center/inner eye wall completely perhaps. But it will take some time to recover from ingesting a bit of dry air. Wait and see sa'more. Who thinks recon may find a weaker storm?
#1347
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:29 PM
Edit: Yep, just went back and checked, NO double wind maximum on this pass.
#1348
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:29 PM
#1349
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:30 PM
#1350
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:30 PM
ursa99, on Sep 11 2008, 01:26 PM, said:
Flame me if you feel it's needed, because I am too much of an amateur to add anything seriously worthwhile here, but....from my perspective it looks like that dry spot pushed the old inner core out and is now part of it is shifting east and it is going to make up a portion of a new eye. I guess the next hour of radar will tell the tale.
#1351
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:32 PM
Demeter, on Sep 11 2008, 10:30 AM, said:
That's kind of what I'm thinking as well... that this was a dry spot ingested in to the center, and that it could make the basis for a new center/eye.
#1353
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:37 PM
janetjanet998, on Sep 11 2008, 01:21 PM, said:
The thread about Gustav was almost identical at this point. Most posts were about , 'is that the eye now, or is it just the end of a small dry air slice'?
Over and over with each new satellite shot. . This is so frustrating. Not the same storm, and not the same strength, but frustration level is reminiscent. Western tip of Cuba and the ensuing environs in the gulf have had this effect on two closely timed canes. Id be very surprised if Ike did any more than fake us out from not til landfall, landing at similar strength as now.
#1356
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:41 PM
ADKwx, on Sep 11 2008, 01:30 PM, said:
Great graphical representation of what everyone is saying about winds not increasing quickly in relation to pressure falls. Buoy 42001
#1358
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:43 PM
#1360
Posted 11 September 2008 - 12:45 PM


Sign In
Register
Help

This topic is locked

MultiQuote
