Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/conf_global.php:1) in /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/admin/sources/base/ipsRegistry.php on line 486

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/conf_global.php:1) in /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/admin/sources/base/ipsRegistry.php on line 486

Warning: Illegal string offset 'html' in /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_1/skin_topic.php on line 909

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/conf_global.php:1) in /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/conf_global.php:1) in /home3/eastern/public_html/bb/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 127
Michael Brown Was Set Up to Fail - Eastern US Weather Forums

Jump to content


Michael Brown Was Set Up to Fail


8 replies to this topic

#1 NoVaSnow

    Smug Alert!

  • Members
  • 2,323 posts
  • Location:Centreville, VA

Posted 14 September 2005 - 08:36 AM

As glad as I am to see Michael Brown gone, it's obvious the problems at FEMA start at the White House. At least Bush is accepting responsibility now.

http://blogs.washing...m/earlywarning/

William M. Arkin on National and Homeland Security
Posted at 08:00 AM ET, 09/14/2005
Michael Brown Was Set Up: It's All in the Numbers

It's so easy to blame Michael Brown, but he got his marching orders from someone else. Weapons of mass destruction, not waves of mass destruction, are the president's priorities. Want to get on the White House Varsity team. Get with the program.

The same obsession that led the Bush administration to see weapons of mass destruction and terrorism in every tea leaf and go to war in Iraq now guides the entire federal government disaster response effort.

How do I prove the point? I've got the goods.

The president's December 17, 2003, National Preparedness directive (Homeland Security Presidential Directive 8) refers to "threatened or actual domestic terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies" (in that order) and defines "all-hazards preparedness" as "preparedness for domestic terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies."

Not exactly an afterthought, those major disasters, but from the presidential directive, government experts prepared a set of "For Official Use Only" National Planning Scenarios -- making its public debut here for the first time -- "describing plausible terrorist attacks and natural disasters that would stretch the Nation's prevention and response capabilities." The fifteen scenarios are "meant to be representative of a broad range of potential terrorist attacks and natural disasters ... to help direct comprehensive preparedness planning efforts," according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). They are:

1. Nuclear Detonation: 10-Kiloton Improvised Nuclear Device
2. Biological Attack: Aerosol Anthrax
3. Biological Disease Outbreak: Pandemic Influenza
4. Biological Attack: Plague
5. Chemical Attack: Blister Agent
6. Chemical Attack: Toxic Industrial Chemical
7. Chemical Attack: Nerve Agent
8. Chemical Attack: Chlorine Tank Explosion
9. Natural Disaster: Major Earthquake
10. Natural Disaster: Major Hurricane
11. Radiological Attack: Radiological Dispersal Device
12. Explosives Attack: Bombing Using Improvised Explosive Devices
13. Biological Attack: Food Contamination
14. Biological Attack: Foreign Animal Disease (Foot and Mouth Disease)
15. Cyber Attack

Score:

Hurricanes and Natural Disasters: 2
Terrorism and WMD: 12

The president's national preparedness directive also required the federal agencies and departments to develop "readiness priorities, targets, and metrics." Utilizing the National Planning Scenarios to identify "the critical tasks that would need to be performed across the fifteen scenarios," DHS thus prepared a Target Capabilities List, "a set of thirty-six essential capabilities that should be developed and maintained, in whole or in part, by various levels of government to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks and major disasters." Version 1.0 of the Target Capabilities List was published January 31, 2005. In the list, various disasters are mentioned this many times:

* Hurricanes: 1
* Natural disasters: 5
* Terrorism: 121
* WMD: 77

Cumulative Score:

Hurricanes and Natural Disasters: 8
Terrorism and WMD: 210

Meanwhile, the National Response Plan was published in December 2004: "an all-discipline, all-hazards plan that establishes a single, comprehensive framework for the management of domestic incidents," according to the document. This is the umbrella plan that guides federal government support to State and local governments.

The "Base" Plan includes seven "incident annexes," (biological, cyber, food or agriculture, nuclear/radiological, oil and hazardous materials, terrorism, "catastrophic") only one of which deals with potential natural disasters. But even here "catastrophic incidents" are defined as "any natural or manmade incident, including terrorism [my emphasis], that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the population, infrastructure, environment, economy, national morale, and/or government functions." In the Base Plan, here's how often various disasters were mentioned:

* Hurricanes: 5
* Natural disasters: 22
* Terrorism: 375
* WMD: 607

Cumulative Score:

Hurricanes and Natural Disasters: 35
Terrorism and WMD: 1,192

Finally, DHS Secretary Tom Ridge published the National Preparedness Guidance on April 27, 2005, summarizing "how the Federal government proposes to strengthen the preparedness of the United States to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies, and how the Federal government proposes to invest homeland security resources in order to achieve the greatest return on investment for our Nation's homeland security." The Guidance says the process "is animated by a sense of urgency and by a commitment to risk-based priorities." In this document, the disasters mentioned breakout is:

* Hurricanes: 3
* Natural disaster: 7
* Terrorism/terrorist: 44
* WMD: 51

Final Score:

Hurricanes and Natural Disasters: 45
Terrorism and WMD: 1,287

FEMA, often a troubled, and almost always a neglected agency, was folded into the Department of Homeland Security where the name of the game is and was terrorism and WMD. State and local communities were themselves pressured to focus their own meager efforts on counter-terrorism and WMD to "be relevant" (and get the federal dollars). Thank God, Katrina has broken this dysfunctional auto-pilot.

Surely as government bureaucrats write more documents and as commissions get underway in Washington, someone must recognize the corrosive effect of focusing on terrorism and WMD to the exclusion of more plausible, frequent, and frankly, more realistic scenarios. FEMA needs to be restored as an independent agency, and it needs to be focused completely on disaster relief, shedding its "homeland security" (read counter-terrorism) and continuity of government missions (more about that coming up). What is more, the entire black hole of DHS needs to search its soul and balance its efforts between real day-to-day American needs and the competing big-bang mania.

#2 bunkybeezer

  • Members
  • 106 posts
  • Location:Alabama

Posted 14 September 2005 - 08:43 AM

Personally, sounds like they have their priorities straight. Numbers 1-8 would kill many, many more citizens than numbers 9,10.

#3 photoz

    poor snowman

  • Members
  • 622 posts
  • Location:Apex, NC

Posted 14 September 2005 - 09:07 AM

bunkybeezer, on Sep 14 2005, 08:43 AM, said:

Personally, sounds like they have their priorities straight.  Numbers 1-8 would kill many, many more citizens than numbers 9,10.

View Post




Factor in frequency and probability and their priorities are not in line what so ever. Then factor preparation time in the mix (which can we prepare for: nuclear/chemical attack OR hurricanes)

#4 Coach McGuirk

    Grade School Drop Out

  • Members
  • 29,861 posts
  • Location:Tabb, VA

Posted 14 September 2005 - 11:00 AM

On an unrelated note does your name mean No(rthern) VA snow or No VA snow?

#5 NoVaSnow

    Smug Alert!

  • Members
  • 2,323 posts
  • Location:Centreville, VA

Posted 14 September 2005 - 11:00 AM

johnhowell, on Sep 14 2005, 12:00 PM, said:

On an unrelated note does your name mean No(rthern) VA snow or No VA snow?

View Post



Northern Virginia. Yes to snow.

#6 photoz

    poor snowman

  • Members
  • 622 posts
  • Location:Apex, NC

Posted 14 September 2005 - 12:15 PM

Some items that were left off the initial list:

16. Natural Disaster: Killer Asteroid
17. Natural Disaster: Attack of mutant spiders
18. Natural Disaster: Dawn of the Dead attack
19. Natural Disaster: Fowl attack over poor working conditions for Aflac duck
20. Domestic Attack: Constitutional attack to allow Bush 3rd tenure as Pres.!

#7 eduggs

  • Members
  • 2,973 posts

Posted 14 September 2005 - 01:59 PM

bunkybeezer, on Sep 14 2005, 08:43 AM, said:

Personally, sounds like they have their priorities straight.  Numbers 1-8 would kill many, many more citizens than numbers 9,10.

View Post




Agree with numbers 1,3, and maybe 8. But 2 and 4-7 are INCORRECT. They would create significant psychological impact. But effective dispersal of chemical, biological, or radiological weaponized agents is very difficult.
Agree with Photoz that probability of occurance needs to be factored into risk assessment.

#8 WxMidwest

  • Members
  • 2,732 posts
  • Location:Vernon County,Wi

Posted 15 September 2005 - 01:42 AM

21. Chinese/Russian/Former Soviet Republic/European Troops Under The Guise of The UN, Force America To form a Pan American Union and dissolve there nation state and constitution.....

#9 WidreMann

    Board Cynic

  • Members
  • 17,698 posts
  • Location:Fancy Part of Chapel Hill, NC

Posted 16 September 2005 - 01:17 PM

ThunderSnow1, on Sep 15 2005, 02:42 AM, said:

21. Chinese/Russian/Former Soviet Republic/European Troops Under The Guise of The UN, Force America To form a Pan American Union and dissolve there nation state and constitution.....

View Post



Think before you post. Ask yourself "does this make sense?" or "is there any realistic basis for what I am about to say?". If the answer is no, then don't post.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users