Oswego vs Syracuse Lake Effect Snow Question... January prospects for LES?
#1
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:12 PM
Does the City (downtown area) of Oswego actually get that much lake effect snow - right on the lake or is it more inland? What about the Syracuse area?
Seems like those are the two cities that actually have some sort of population in that region. Otherwise, it appears to be a lot of rural areas - small towns.
#2
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:14 PM
BeauDodson, on Nov 30 2008, 07:12 PM, said:
Does the City of Oswega actually get that much lake effect snow - right on the lake or is it more inland? What about the Syracuse area?
Seems like those are the two cities that actually have some sort of population in that region. Otherwise, it appears to be a lot of rural areas - small towns.
Both locations see decent amounts of LES (give Oswego an obvious edge), but if you really want to see LES, travel to Redfield, NY.
#4
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:16 PM
#5
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:18 PM
BeauDodson, on Nov 30 2008, 08:12 PM, said:
Does the City of Oswega actually get that much lake effect snow - right on the lake or is it more inland? What about the Syracuse area?
Seems like those are the two cities that actually have some sort of population in that region. Otherwise, it appears to be a lot of rural areas - small towns.
It's Oswego. But Fulton gets more snow and is a bigger city. It's located in south-central Oswego County.
#9
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:21 PM
Oswego Alumni Article
#11
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:25 PM
BeauDodson, on Nov 30 2008, 07:19 PM, said:
Another interesting note that you should know.
Syracuse, NY takes their snow measurements from Hancock Airport, which is about 5-10 miles north of the city. That 5-10 miles makes a big difference because while there are only flurries in the city, heavy LES falling at 1-2"/hour could be falling at the airport. Happens frequently, which inflates Syracuse's snow totals.
#12
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:28 PM
StotaRattler, on Nov 30 2008, 07:25 PM, said:
Syracuse, NY takes their snow measurements from Hancock Airport, which is about 5-10 miles north of the city. That 5-10 miles makes a big difference because while there are only flurries in the city, heavy LES falling at 1-2"/hour could be falling at the airport. Happens frequently, which inflates Syracuse's snow totals.
Ding ding ding! I contest that the City of Syracuse receives on average MAYBE 100-110" per season, but it goes in the books as 123" or whatever it is because of Hancock Field's location. It's like being listed in the Media Guide as 6'0", when you're really 5'11" 1/4".
#13
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:31 PM
StotaRattler, on Nov 30 2008, 08:25 PM, said:
Syracuse, NY takes their snow measurements from Hancock Airport, which is about 5-10 miles north of the city. That 5-10 miles makes a big difference because while there are only flurries in the city, heavy LES falling at 1-2"/hour could be falling at the airport. Happens frequently, which inflates Syracuse's snow totals.
Yep, and actually they have the opposite problem in Rochester. They have a 103" average at the airport but its located on the southwest side of the city. If it were located closer to Webster or something they would get more snow. For Buffalo, the airport is in Cheektowaga (97") which gets more snow than downtown Buffalo does.
#14
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:33 PM
And, ofcourse, with the snow up on the tug, it often makes it feel that our snow down here is piddily. The tug can get a band that generates a foot in a few hours. I can have a band sit over my house for 24 hours to pick up a foot. Mind you, I'm not complaining:) But, I did need to pick up a liittle place on the Tug cause the snow in the'Cuse just would not cut it for me.
#15
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:39 PM
#16
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:43 PM
Thats when the DOT in Fultons roof caved in.
#17
Posted 30 November 2008 - 07:45 PM
danno, on Nov 30 2008, 08:39 PM, said:
Ehh..yeah but downtown Buffalo only averages about 80" so that wouldn't necessarily benefit there either. I just checked the snow stats, and it appears that areas closer to Lake Ontario in Rochester proper don't average more than the Airport. The airport probably catches some Lake Erie bands more readily, making up for the loss of Lake Ontario. The 103" at Rochester could give the city of Syracuse a run for its money though.


Help











