What tonight should of been like
#1
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:16 PM
2) Radio Show
3) 84 hour NAM showing 983 low near Hatterras
4) GFS finally catching on, showing purple qpf colors over the Mid Atlantic
5) HM talking UVV's and Deform zone
6) HPC talking about rare March Blizzard for Mid Atlantic with 1-2 foot possibilities
7) JB headline" SPRING EAST COAST BLIZZARD UPDATE
8) EURO for 4th straight day showing a closed low in the SE and a blizzard for the East Coast
9) TV guys starting to catch on....
Instead
we see this
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/18/images/gfs_pcp_084m.gif
#2
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:24 PM
#3
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:25 PM
#4
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:25 PM
#5
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:26 PM
Actually, in early spring snow chances evaporating is exactly what this should be like.
#6
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:31 PM
Ji, on Mar 21 2008, 10:16 PM, said:
2) Radio Show
3) 84 hour NAM showing 983 low near Hatterras
4) GFS finally catching on, showing purple qpf colors over the Mid Atlantic
5) HM talking UVV's and Deform zone
6) HPC talking about rare March Blizzard for Mid Atlantic with 1-2 foot possibilities
7) JB headline" SPRING EAST COAST BLIZZARD UPDATE
8) EURO for 4th straight day showing a closed low in the SE and a blizzard for the East Coast
9) TV guys starting to catch on....
Instead
we see this
:lmao: so true man, i am with ya this is just another kick in the azz :thumbsdown:
oh and congrats weathervswife
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/nam/00/images/nam_pcp_054s.gif
#7
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:32 PM
#11
Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:01 PM
:thumbsdown:
#12
Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:19 PM
Oh, and it's "what tonight should HAVE been like," dummy.
:gun_bandana:
#13
Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:20 PM
#15
Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:26 PM
mitchnick, on Mar 21 2008, 10:20 PM, said:
we're talking about ji... anything without a storm only makes him weaker.... :popcorn:
but in all seriousness, it is a bummer for you guys I'm sure, but at least you know there will be next winter...
#16
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:01 AM
All that hype, wasted energy and wasted potential .... what looked so good so close... it was the opposite of JAN 2000 ....
So this current situation is a BREEZE in comparison and certainly no where need the magnitude of that upset.
OH and speaking of VVs and deformation zones ... watch SE VA / NC w/ this near miss. Strong PVA here, near deformation zone create some VVs and potential for snow.
#17
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:05 AM
HM, on Mar 22 2008, 12:01 AM, said:
All that hype, wasted energy and wasted potential .... what looked so good so close... it was the opposite of JAN 2000 ....
So this current situation is a BREEZE in comparison and certainly no where need the magnitude of that upset.
OH and speaking of VVs and deformation zones ... watch SE VA / NC w/ this near miss. Strong PVA here, near deformation zone create some VVs and potential for snow.
I can help you with why that storm failed if you are ever interested... That goes for everyone else, too.
hint: there's a sneaking teleconnector not yet defined, or recognized, in the Caribbean. it's origin is probably south of the tropic of cancer.
#18
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:08 AM
Typhoon_Tip, on Mar 22 2008, 12:05 AM, said:
hint: there's a sneaking teleconnector not yet defined, or recognized, in the Caribbean. it's origin is probably south of the tropic of cancer.
I am not sure if you are being sarcastic here or not ....
anywho...
The storm failed in the mid atlantic b/c of the modeling ---- s/w rounding the base of the PV lobe didnt phase.
#19
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:09 AM
Typhoon_Tip, on Mar 22 2008, 01:05 AM, said:
hint: there's a sneaking teleconnector not yet defined, or recognized, in the Caribbean. it's origin is probably south of the tropic of cancer.
The 582 dm not conductive to cyclogenesis?
#20
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:19 AM
HM, on Mar 22 2008, 12:08 AM, said:
anywho...
The storm failed in the mid atlantic b/c of the modeling ---- s/w rounding the base of the PV lobe didnt phase.
No sarcasm! And...yes, failed because models do not account for rare cross-Equatorial mid level flow.


Help











