Moderate la nina at our doorstep
#1
Posted 17 September 2007 - 01:38 PM
#2
Posted 17 September 2007 - 01:45 PM
Tempest, on Sep 17 2007, 02:38 PM, said:
Well, ur sidekick KyWetter has jumped off the Nina bandwagon, you might wanna check out Ed Berry's latest blog.
#3
Posted 17 September 2007 - 01:46 PM
Tempest, on Sep 17 2007, 01:38 PM, said:
Another viewpoint as well..
http://www.cdc.noaa....MEI/#discussion
#4
Posted 17 September 2007 - 01:48 PM
Tempest, on Sep 17 2007, 06:38 PM, said:
Tempest, this is the thread referred above (kywetter): http://www.easternuswx.com/bb/index.php?sh...142176&st=0
Note in there Vawxman has a link that Scripps is saying the same thing.
JB is pretty adamant on a La Nina, though.
#5
Posted 17 September 2007 - 01:55 PM
JamieO, on Sep 17 2007, 02:48 PM, said:
Note in there Vawxman has a link that Scripps is saying the same thing.
JB is pretty adamant on a La Nina, though.
Well that clinches it.
#6
Posted 17 September 2007 - 02:03 PM
#7
Posted 17 September 2007 - 02:08 PM
rainshadow, on Sep 17 2007, 03:03 PM, said:
Neither would I, but nor I do I think that its time to start a thread declaring entry into mod Nina conditions, esp. considering that the CPC has ceratin guidlines of which we are still months away from meeting.
#8
Posted 17 September 2007 - 02:20 PM
#10
Posted 17 September 2007 - 02:32 PM
#11
Posted 17 September 2007 - 02:38 PM
40/70 Benchmark, on Sep 17 2007, 02:45 PM, said:
The numbers I am looking at indicate +PDO's setting up for winter. I have a feeling that any Nina will be weak and short-lived.
#12
Posted 17 September 2007 - 02:43 PM
40/70 Benchmark, on Sep 17 2007, 02:45 PM, said:
No, I haven't jumped off the Nina bandwagon yet. The QBO is tanking to possibly record levels, the GLAAM remains sub -2 and is falling again, the SOI* is sky-high, and SOI is finally rising...not really signs of an emminent Nino anytime soon. Last of all, Scripps is the only model, out of 21 ENSO models, to be forecasting a Nino this winter.
#14
Posted 17 September 2007 - 03:25 PM
#16
Posted 17 September 2007 - 04:59 PM
#17
Posted 17 September 2007 - 05:02 PM
I see JB keeps trotting out 1954 and 1998 analogs with La Ninas and I can't recall the temperatures (obviously wouldn't recall '54), but it looks like Albany had sub par snowfall those years. Something like 37"and 44" inches respectively with normal being mid 60s.
PACNW_WX, on Sep 17 2007, 05:53 PM, said:
#18
Posted 17 September 2007 - 05:18 PM
Logan11, on Sep 17 2007, 03:02 PM, said:
I see JB keeps trotting out 1954 and 1998 analogs with La Ninas and I can't recall the temperatures (obviously wouldn't recall '54), but it looks like Albany had sub par snowfall those years. Something like 37"and 44" inches respectively with normal being mid 60s.
La Ninas back east are entirely dependent on the NAO. Historically when the NAO is negative, weak or moderate La Ninas have been pretty good back there. In those cases, it's more of a North vs. South temperature gradient than East vs. West. Everywhere in the country north of 40 degrees can score with a Moderate Nina if the other indicies are half decent.
#19
Posted 17 September 2007 - 05:28 PM
40/70 Benchmark, on Sep 17 2007, 03:08 PM, said:
According to this CDC page on MEI ranks:
http://www.cdc.noaa....r/MEI/rank.html
the MEI would have to be ranked as one of the 12 lowest values on a bimonthly basis to be considered moderate.
The Aug-Sep value would have to be below -.659, and the Sep-Oct value below -.776 to be a moderate Nina. We're not that close.
#20
Posted 17 September 2007 - 05:30 PM
40/70 Benchmark, on Sep 17 2007, 10:45 AM, said:
Not my side kick, I dont side with anybody who doesnt like snow.
JamieO, on Sep 17 2007, 10:48 AM, said:
Note in there Vawxman has a link that Scripps is saying the same thing.
JB is pretty adamant on a La Nina, though.
Scripps model is rediculous. Its plainly obvious the atmosphere is madly pushing for la nina and the surface is finally responding. The two month average right now -.518 and assuming this month stays good and negative the tri monthly could be -.7 by the end of September. As for JB....
brainstorm, on Sep 17 2007, 11:38 AM, said:
The numbers you are looking at are wrong. Its negative now and becoming more so all the time.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














